Home » Arizona AI Policy Adviser Says Job Disruption Fears are ‘Real Legitimate’

Arizona AI Policy Adviser Says Job Disruption Fears are ‘Real Legitimate’

by Editor
0 comments

Arizona is building its first statewide blueprint on artificial intelligence, and one of the advisers helping write it says the technology will touch every part of your life – whether you’re ready or not.

Dr. Loretta Cheeks sits on Governor Katie Hobbs’ AI Steering Committee. She’s one of 19 people tasked with answering questions that will affect every Arizonan: Where should the state deploy AI in government operations? How can it do so responsibly? Where should humans stay in control?

The computer scientist and CEO of AI consulting firm DS Innovation is direct about the technology’s potential to displace workers. But she’s equally direct about the opportunity it presents if Arizona moves wisely.

“We need to move from fear to anticipation,” Dr. Cheeks said. “It’s here. It will not go anywhere.”

The committee’s initial recommendations are expected this spring. The governor tasked the group to come up with an AI policy framework, along with recommendations on government procurement guidelines and how to prepare the state’s workforce.

The Human-in-the-Loop Rule

Last year, Arizona passed legislation banning insurance companies from denying coverage based on AI decisions alone. The law says a human doctor must be involved. It’s exactly the kind of guardrail Dr. Cheeks wants to see in other high-stakes decisions the state makes.

“When you’re talking about critical systems or things that will alter a person’s life — child welfare, determining who gets benefits, or using behavior data to detect a risk score and applying it to someone — at that time, yes, [AI] should not be solely responsible,” she said. “The human is really good at making decisions, and we should definitely keep them in the loop.”

Cheeks draws on her background in aviation, where critical systems have long required human oversight. But she’s clear about where AI can and should take over routine work, a category she calls “AI comprehension and language.”

“That’s anything from workflow, office automation, text summarization, document summarization. Even cybersecurity and penetration testing, it can actually work well,” she said.

The line, she says, is drawn at decisions that carry physical or life-altering consequences. Cheeks specifically flagged surveillance, military operations, and enforcement as areas requiring deeper scrutiny and stronger guardrails before AI is deployed.

Threading AI Through Every Subject

The real transformation, Cheeks argues, needs to happen in classrooms, but not in the way most people think.

She says traditionally, AI education might be siloed inside computer science courses. Instead, she envisions “literally braiding it and threading it through all disciplines.”

She said access to AI education should be thought of like English literacy. To her, it’s not about creating more programmers. It’s about preparing everyone, from firefighters to HVAC technicians, for a world where AI touches every job.

“AI literacy is needed because it literally is impacting everything that we do,” Cheeks said.

As for whether AI literacy should be required in K-12 schools, a debate currently playing out at the Arizona Capitol, Cheeks stops short of calling for a mandate.

“I think reading, math, and some simple things should be required,” she said. “I think that we should strongly encourage” AI education, adding that curricula should help students see “the beauty of it and also the harm of it.”

Teaching AI Without the Shortcut

How do you teach students to use AI without also giving them the tools to cut corners and cheat? Cheeks has a framework for that because she’s seen what works firsthand.

She founded Strong TIES, a STEAM nonprofit focused on bringing AI, machine learning, and data science education to underserved communities.

“Helping a student to know, trash in is trash out,” she explained. “And also helping the student to think critically.”

She guides students to dig deeper, ask follow-up questions, and understand the why behind AI responses. It’s the difference between using AI as a shortcut and using it as a thinking partner.

“If you give them step-by-step and start to ask them the deeper questions — ‘Oh, well, that’s great, but have you thought about this?’ — it kind of guides the exchange,” she said.

The Displacement Question

When asked whether state workers’ fear of AI job displacement was legitimate, Cheeks didn’t soften her response.

“It is real legitimate,” she said. “Anything that is simple and that is routine, AI will probably take that over. But on the flip side of that, oftentimes AI exposes new opportunities and new career paths.”

She sees opportunity alongside the disruption. Healthcare and education both face massive labor shortages that AI could help address.

Dr. Cheeks draws on a metaphor she learned growing up in the country to help translate alarm into action.

“If you had a rock in your shoe, what do you focus on? That pain, right? Everything else is blocked out. And so we do have to shift from fear.”

She compares AI to a knife, capable of performing surgery or causing harm, depending on how it’s used. The goal, she says, is building systems responsibly enough that lives can depend on them.

“If your life depended on what is built, I think consideration would be made that is more deeper and more considerate.”

For Cheeks, that’s the standard Arizona, and the country should be holding itself to it as it writes the rules for the AI age.

 

 

Originally written by: Derek Staahl

Source: 13 News

Published on: 16 April 2026

Link to original article: Arizona AI policy adviser says job disruption fears are ‘real legitimate’

You may also like

Leave a Comment